AVAILABLE OPPORTUNITIES (312) 781-9000
14 Sep

Managing Partner Compensation Expectations in a Record Financial Year

by: Astor Professional Search

How do successful leaders and firms manage their compensation expectations in a record financial year? A recent article by The American Lawyer investigates, positing that some of the most effective means for managing the compensation expectations of partners include structural elements in their compensation system, leadership techniques, and talented, communicative leaders. Blane Prescott, a consultant for legal consulting firm, MesaFive LLC, notes “some firms suffer morale and trust issues because their compensation process fails to manage expectations. Compensation isn’t just about setting a number and then defending one’s decisions. There are many firms for whom setting partner compensation is a surprisingly easy and smooth process, regardless of whether profits are up or down, because they focus on managing expectations and helping partners to succeed.”

Most firms understand the benefits of talking with partners about performance and compensation, but one important question is, is it better to do that before or after setting compensation? It may sound illogical but talking to partners before setting their compensation produces dramatically better engagement, improved performance in the following year, and more effectively manages expectations. But they only work if firms do those interviews well, and unfortunately, perhaps only a quarter of all law firms meet that standard. Good interviews are two-way conversations, focused on helping the partner to be more successful. They explore each partner’s strengths and weaknesses and include a focused discussion of priorities for the coming year, (as quoted in The American Lawyer).

It is often said it is rare to find great leaders who lack great communication skills. Not all communication skills are the same—some leaders are gifted at talking to groups, while others are fabulous at counseling individuals. The key question for managing expectations is, do firms have leaders (at the firm, practice and office level) routinely communicate substantive information and meaningful analyses (not just highly filtered, quantitative data) to partners all throughout the year?  Are they honest about telling partners when the firm is doing well, and when the firm isn’t? Are they skilled at accurately describing what the challenges are and how to address them? Are they open about the financial data they share, or does it constantly feel like they are just spinning selected facts?, (as quoted in The American Lawyer).

See highlights from the full article on The American Lawyer.

Contact Bill Sugarman for more information.

Share it here
Related Posts
26 Jan Trends for Mid-Size Law Firms Heading into 2019
Trends for Mid-Size Law Firms Heading into 2019

The American Lawyer reports on several key trends for midsize law firms heading into 2019, according to a recent article featur...

29 Jan Global In-House Leaders Prefer Working with Smaller Firms, Survey Finds
Global In-House Leaders Prefer Working with Sma...

In-House Counsel at large international companies experience greater satisfaction when working with small or medium sized firms, acc...

23 May Highlights from the 2016 Am Law 100
Highlights from the 2016 Am Law 100

The American Lawyer just released the results of the most recent Am Law 100, their annual financial report of the top 100 U.S. ...